It's Not Me Onstage But I'm Also Not You or Playing At Being A Real Person
In an ideal world, docu-dramas and documentaries would
simply present the facts and let the audience decide for themselves. However, I
believe this is an impossible aim. As Mike pointed out in class: even in a
documentary, there is a director shaping what you see and don’t see. The “dark
matter” of the story points left out of a documentary says almost as much about
the story being told as those deemed important enough to be included.
Docu-dramas
and verbatim theatre fail to succeed in remaining impartial (in my eyes) for
the same reason: the playwright chooses what to include and what to leave out.
They choose the format in which the story is laid out. They choose how to
present each detail to the audience. It is the playwright, rather than the
subject, that has the control. But there is an added layer of distance in
theatre: the actors. I don’t care how good of an actor you are, you are still
inherently yourself and therefore onstage you are still you “playing” another
person. It doesn’t matter that that person exists for real in the world: you
are not that person.
In the
mid 2000s I saw a play called Nine
Parts of Desire. The play, written by Iraqi-American Heather Raffo, is a
one-woman show in which a female actor depicts nine different Iraqi women. Raffo
spent months interviewing different women in order to accumulate material for
the piece. Though not billed as a “docu-drama” per say, there was no denying
the truth of the women’s experiences.
Two
important things jump out at me from my memory of this production. The first is
that the woman I saw perform the play was not Iraqi (yay for overlap into this
weeks readings!). Her performance was stellar and her transformations between
each woman were specific and drastic. Her dialect work was on point. Amiriyah shelter bombing.
My mind would not fully believe that she was an Iraqi street peddler who had
lived through all of the political turmoil in her country. She was always a white woman (admittedly one that I knew outside of the theatre) doing a very good Iraqi accent. She may have even looked the part, with her olive skin and charcoal lined eyes. But she
was not Iraqi. Automatically the piece lost some of the impact because none of
these stories could believably be hers. My mind would not believe that she was
an Iraqi woman who had lost her entire family in the
The second
thing that jumped out at me was that the play was written before the United
States invaded Iraq. Though Raffo later went back and added characters who were
obviously political or in direct response to the Iraq invasion, several of the
pieces are simple depictions of Iraqi women dealing with issues that are not
specific to Iraq but are issues woman around the world would identify with. Yet
the change in the political climate, the change in the relationship of the
world and Iraq at the time of the plays release (and especially at the time of
my viewing) made the piece inherently political.
So here I
am at the end of my blog and still I think that verbatim theatre cannot be used
as a sort of theatrical newspaper because there is still performance. There are
still layers of interpretation placed, perhaps unintentionally but there they
are, between the truth and what the audience sees. Still I think there is value
in depicting true events. It is how we have kept our histories alive for
centuries, after all.
It is so cool that you got to see Nine Parts of Desire! I read it in undergrad and absolutely loved it. I've heard it said that theatre will never be fully replaced by film because theatre is an active medium (while film is a passive one). If decide to look at this in that mindset, this is a perfect piece for people to see; to viscerally feel what these Iraqi women went through. Your mention of people identifying with her is spot on! I wholeheartedly agree that theatre cannot be used impartially. Perhaps the inevitable coloring of a performance (no matter how verbatim) can be used as a way of identifying these narratives and how they fit in to whatever the meta-narrative may be (that said, I don't think any person can experience objective reality but that is neither here nor there).
ReplyDeleteAs a supporting anecdote to your mention of how you can't control what the audience sees, the Shakespeare company I used to work for put on a production of Henry V that was mistaken for anti-war propaganda by journalists. The show was inordinately martial (incorporating Suzuki method on stage to a high degree, a play about a war hero, etc) but certainly never intended as a political statement against the war in Iraq. So. Like. You know, audiences are stuck in subjective land so let's put some new perspectives into their collective schemata!